Posted by
Alan Cohen on Saturday, August 19, 2006 9:47:27 PM
I'm a fan of
Wikipedia. I like the concept. Collaboration and social media interest me.
Initially,
I was surprised when I saw Wikipedia entries for the gubernatorial
candidates. After a moment, I thought "why not". The Web offers a
variety of techniques for communication. That is what the Web is about,
communication.
The following candidates have Wikipedia entries.
I
find this to be an interesting use of the Web. If these biographies are
updated during the campaign, they can provide a comprehensive listing
of each campaign. For writers and researchers, it provides a
one stop place for information, a bit easier than searching throughout a multitude of newspapers.
But
that is also the problem. As a writer and researcher, I am always
concerned about the veracity of the facts. Whenever I read an article,
I always research the author. Is the author:
- a member of the same party of the candidate
- a member of the campaign staff
- campaign volunteer
- friend, and so on.
Just
like this blog and blogger, anyone can easily publish on the Web.
Always check your sources. I'm sure campaign staff or campaign-friendly
people wrote each bio of each candidate.
Wikipedia presents another interesting point. Anyone can edit any Wikipedia article. This opens the door for
mis-information. It allows the opportunity for negative campaigning at a whole new level.
As
a frequent user of Wikipedia, and casual contributor, I know the
Wikipedia volunteers are very good at policing entries and removing
false information. With political entries, I think the Wikipedia
volunteers and readers will have to not only discern the facts, but
also discern opinion from fact.
Alvin Toffler (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_Toffler) discusses the concept of mis-information in his book
PowerShift (www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553292153/sr=1-1/qid=1155404887/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-7842903-7083052?ie=UTF8&s=books).
As
with any technology, the user (and reader) must think. Always question
and always do your homework. I'm sure some will read and believe
whatever they read.
I plan to keep an eye on these Wikipedia entries. It will be interesting to see if they play an important role in the campaign.
Sincerely,
Alan